Supreme Court upholds Affordable Care Act
The US Supreme Court ruled that the core of the federal health care legislation, the individual mandate, was constitutional, on Thursday morning.
The court upheld the majority of the Affordable Care Act, including the controversial individual mandate, according to the SCOTUS blog.
Chief Justice John Roberts sided with the liberal justices on the bench.
CNN initially got it wrong, reporting that the mandate was struck down.
As The Washington Post noted, the decision could play a pivotal role in President Obama’s bid for re-election. The health care law was a landmark achievement for the Obama presidency, while Republicans and presidential candidate Mitt Romney vowed to repeal it.
If upheld, the law would extend coverage to more than 30 million Americans who currently lack it, said The Post.
The court was deciding on three separate matters:
1. Whether the case could be heard yet, because of the Anti-Injunction Act which says that taxes cannot be challenged until they are first levied. The court was to decide whether the health care law’s penalties, which would be due in 2015, could be considered a tax, said The New York Times.
2. Whether the individual mandate, what some consider the core of the Affordable Care Act, was constitutional. The mandate requires even healthy people to have health insurance or risk paying a penalty, and would make universal health care a possibility.
Critics of the health care law said the mandate amounted to the government forcing people to buy a service they did not need, according to NPR.Supporters of the mandate saw it as a way of spreading the cost of health insurance among a wider pool of people.
More on GlobalPost: Supreme Court considers core of health care law, the individual mandate
3. If the mandate was struck down, the court would decide how much of the law could be preserved. Called “severability,” this means the court would have to decide how much of the health care law could survive if the individual mandate was ruled unconstitutional. Many argue that other provisions in the health care law, such as a ban on insurers denying people coverage due to preexisting conditions would not work well without the individual mandate.
Back in March, The Post reported that Justice Antonin Scalia asked the court-appointed lawyer arguing for severability, “Is this not totally unrealistic? That we are going to go through this enormous bill item by item and decide each one?”
The SCOTUS blog provided a guide to reading the Supreme Court’s ruling, here.
More on GlobalPost: Supreme Court debates health care without individual mandate