6.26.2012
NATO has held an emergency session to decide the international response after Syria shot down a Turkish military jet.
Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen said NATO’s 28 members were agreed that Syria’s actions were “unacceptable,” and promised to stand by Turkey. 
Ankara summoned today’s meeting after invoking Article 4, the part of the NATO treaty that allows for consultations when one of the allies is attacked or threatened. That’s a notch down from Article 5, which states that an attack on one ally is an attack on all.
It indicates that Turkey won’t seek military intervention – but the country’s “rational response” should not be mistaken for weakness, Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan has warned.
Want to know:Both sides of the debate can claim a partial victory after yesterday’s Supreme Court ruling that struck down parts of Arizona’s hotly disputed immigration law while leaving one of its most controversial measures intact.
Undocumented immigrants cannot be considered criminals if they work or seek work in the state, nor can immigrants be obliged to register with the federal government. State police will not be allowed to arrest people on mere suspicion of being an illegal immigrant – but they will be required to check their papers. 
Arizona’s Republican governor, Jan Brewer, celebrated what she called a victory for “all Americans who believe in the inherent right and responsibility of states to defend their citizens.” President Barack Obama, meanwhile, hailed the same ruling as a step away from “a patchwork of state laws” on immigration.
The real test will come once Arizona authorities start enforcing the “stop and check” provision, which, while cleared in theory, could be ruled an infringement of civil rights in action. Unfortunately for anyone state law enforcement thinks “looks like an illegal immigrant,” they’ll have to be the test case. But hey, you think you’ve got it bad? Check out five other places where being an immigrant really, really sucks.
Dull but important:We’ve seen the future of Europe… and it’s centralized.
European Union authorities unveiled their blueprint for “A Genuine Economic and Monetary Union” this morning, ahead of Thursday and Friday’s EU summit. Proposals include a European treasury, a single banking regulator and deposit guarantee scheme, and limits on new debt members are allowed to take on. Collective borrowing could also be “explored,” the report says.
Finance ministers from France, Germany, Spain and Italy meet today; the rest of the EU gathers Thursday for a conference that some say will “lay the groundwork for the second phase of the euro.”
Just because:“I’m doing this for the money,” says one of Spain’s millions of young, unemployed and indebted citizens. She, like an increasing number of Spaniards in the same boat, are turning to one of the few markets still buoyant, and selling their eggs or sperm.
Trading in eggs and sperm is forbidden under Spanish law, but assisted reproduction centers are allowed to pay donors a “compensation fee” for the inconvenience, transportation costs and time spent away from work – or from looking for work. For those donating, it can be an instant, if invasive, way of making some much-needed cash.
But the rise in donations has also raised questions. What are the health and ethical implications of the emergence of “professional donors”?
Strange but true:Women of China, the subway authorities have some advice for you: stop dressing so damn hot.
Shanghai Metro has instructed female passengers to “have self-respect” and avoid scanty summer dresses to avoid attracting the attention of subway gropers. The company illustrated its dubious counsel with a from-behind shot of a woman wearing a sheer dress over clearly visible underwear.
Women travelers could cover up during the sweltering Shanghai summer. Or hey, here’s another idea: why not tell the perverts to get off and walk? You can start with the one taking photos of that lady’s lingerie.

NATO has held an emergency session to decide the international response after Syria shot down a Turkish military jet.

Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen said NATO’s 28 members were agreed that Syria’s actions were “unacceptable,” and promised to stand by Turkey. 

Ankara summoned today’s meeting after invoking Article 4, the part of the NATO treaty that allows for consultations when one of the allies is attacked or threatened. That’s a notch down from Article 5, which states that an attack on one ally is an attack on all.

It indicates that Turkey won’t seek military intervention – but the country’s “rational response” should not be mistaken for weakness, Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan has warned.

Want to know:
Both sides of the debate can claim a partial victory after yesterday’s Supreme Court ruling that struck down parts of Arizona’s hotly disputed immigration law while leaving one of its most controversial measures intact.

Undocumented immigrants cannot be considered criminals if they work or seek work in the state, nor can immigrants be obliged to register with the federal government. State police will not be allowed to arrest people on mere suspicion of being an illegal immigrant – but they will be required to check their papers. 

Arizona’s Republican governor, Jan Brewer, celebrated what she called a victory for “all Americans who believe in the inherent right and responsibility of states to defend their citizens.” President Barack Obama, meanwhile, hailed the same ruling as a step away from “a patchwork of state laws” on immigration.

The real test will come once Arizona authorities start enforcing the “stop and check” provision, which, while cleared in theory, could be ruled an infringement of civil rights in action. Unfortunately for anyone state law enforcement thinks “looks like an illegal immigrant,” they’ll have to be the test case. But hey, you think you’ve got it bad? Check out five other places where being an immigrant really, really sucks.

Dull but important:
We’ve seen the future of Europe… and it’s centralized.

European Union authorities unveiled their blueprint for “A Genuine Economic and Monetary Union” this morning, ahead of Thursday and Friday’s EU summit. Proposals include a European treasury, a single banking regulator and deposit guarantee scheme, and limits on new debt members are allowed to take on. Collective borrowing could also be “explored,” the report says.

Finance ministers from France, Germany, Spain and Italy meet today; the rest of the EU gathers Thursday for a conference that some say will “lay the groundwork for the second phase of the euro.”

Just because:
“I’m doing this for the money,” says one of Spain’s millions of young, unemployed and indebted citizens. She, like an increasing number of Spaniards in the same boat, are turning to one of the few markets still buoyant, and selling their eggs or sperm.

Trading in eggs and sperm is forbidden under Spanish law, but assisted reproduction centers are allowed to pay donors a “compensation fee” for the inconvenience, transportation costs and time spent away from work – or from looking for work. For those donating, it can be an instant, if invasive, way of making some much-needed cash.

But the rise in donations has also raised questions. What are the health and ethical implications of the emergence of “professional donors”?

Strange but true:
Women of China
, the subway authorities have some advice for you: stop dressing so damn hot.

Shanghai Metro has instructed female passengers to “have self-respect” and avoid scanty summer dresses to avoid attracting the attention of subway gropers. The company illustrated its dubious counsel with a from-behind shot of a woman wearing a sheer dress over clearly visible underwear.

Women travelers could cover up during the sweltering Shanghai summer. Or hey, here’s another idea: why not tell the perverts to get off and walk? You can start with the one taking photos of that lady’s lingerie.

2 notes
Permalink
Posted at 9:48 AM
6.25.2012
Top 5 worst countries to be an immigrant 
The US Supreme Court voted Monday to uphold one of the most controversial parts of Arizona’s immigration law: the requirement that police check the status of someone suspected of being in the US illegally. 
However, Arizona isn’t the only place that has clamped down unfavorably on its immigrant population. Here, we take a look at five of the world’s worst places to be a foreigner. 
More from GlobalPost: Supreme Court strikes down parts of Arizona immigration law
1. Latvia 
According to the Migration Integration Policy Index (MIP), Latvia’s immigration policies are the worst of 31 countries surveyed worldwide.
Why? Well, the Eastern European country barely follows the EU’s standards for immigration, and “takes only the ‘minimum’ approach to fight discrimination” in terms of who it lets migrate, MIP reported. Latvia also does not give immigrants immediate rights to work. Because its immigration procedures are so loosely interpreted by officials, many immigrants remain “insecure” in their status, according to MIP. 
2. Japan
Tokyo’s government officials will pay immigrants to get out of their country — literally. 
Passed in the spring of 2009, the “Nikkei” Law (Nikkei refers to a Latin American immigrant of Japanese descent) offers unemployed Latin American immigrants $3,000 to leave Japan and return to their home country, Foreign Policy reported. Their family members also get $2,000 for the relocation. There’s just one catch: you only get the payment if you promise that you will never return to Japan to work. Not exactly the fairest trade we’ve ever heard. 
3. Thailand
Thailand and Arizona have more in common in terms of immigration law than one might think. 
In March 2010, the Southeast Asian country passed a series of measures that required its roughly 1.5 million migrants to register their identities with Thai authorities, the Wall Street Journal reported. All immigrants must prove their nationalities and have them verified by their home countries, or else face deportation from Thailand.  
A report by Human Rights Watch also found a pattern of arbitrary arrests, rapes, and forced bribing of migrants. 
4. United Arab Emirates
The flood of immigrant workers from Southeast Asia and India have helped buoy the UAE to become one of the Middle East’s most successful economies, but its immigration laws have yet to catch up, according to Foreign Policy.
One of the country’s most controversial laws prohibits foreigners from participating in labor unions. This means that living conditions for migrants often include 80-hour work weeks, intense manual labor, and below-minimum-wage salaries, FP reported. The typical situation for immigrants in UAE? “Tiny pre-fabricated huts, 12 men to a room, forced to wash themselves in filthy brown water and cook in kitchens next to overflowing toilets,” The Guardian reported. 
5. Australia
Australia may not come off as a harsh place for immigrants, but the country is still working off of its 1958 Migration Act, which mandates that non-citizens found to be in Australia without proper visas be detained. Furthermore, “unless they are granted permission to remain in Australia, they must be removed as soon as reasonably practicable,” according to the country’s Department of Immigration and Citizenship. 
A report by Australia’s Human Rights commission found that the country’s child refugees were abused and mistreated while in detention. 

Top 5 worst countries to be an immigrant 

The US Supreme Court voted Monday to uphold one of the most controversial parts of Arizona’s immigration law: the requirement that police check the status of someone suspected of being in the US illegally. 

However, Arizona isn’t the only place that has clamped down unfavorably on its immigrant population. Here, we take a look at five of the world’s worst places to be a foreigner. 

More from GlobalPost: Supreme Court strikes down parts of Arizona immigration law

1. Latvia 

According to the Migration Integration Policy Index (MIP), Latvia’s immigration policies are the worst of 31 countries surveyed worldwide.

Why? Well, the Eastern European country barely follows the EU’s standards for immigration, and “takes only the ‘minimum’ approach to fight discrimination” in terms of who it lets migrate, MIP reported. Latvia also does not give immigrants immediate rights to work. Because its immigration procedures are so loosely interpreted by officials, many immigrants remain “insecure” in their status, according to MIP. 

2. Japan

Tokyo’s government officials will pay immigrants to get out of their country — literally. 

Passed in the spring of 2009, the “Nikkei” Law (Nikkei refers to a Latin American immigrant of Japanese descent) offers unemployed Latin American immigrants $3,000 to leave Japan and return to their home country, Foreign Policy reported. Their family members also get $2,000 for the relocation. There’s just one catch: you only get the payment if you promise that you will never return to Japan to work. Not exactly the fairest trade we’ve ever heard. 

3. Thailand

Thailand and Arizona have more in common in terms of immigration law than one might think. 

In March 2010, the Southeast Asian country passed a series of measures that required its roughly 1.5 million migrants to register their identities with Thai authorities, the Wall Street Journal reported. All immigrants must prove their nationalities and have them verified by their home countries, or else face deportation from Thailand.  

A report by Human Rights Watch also found a pattern of arbitrary arrests, rapes, and forced bribing of migrants. 

4. United Arab Emirates

The flood of immigrant workers from Southeast Asia and India have helped buoy the UAE to become one of the Middle East’s most successful economies, but its immigration laws have yet to catch up, according to Foreign Policy.

One of the country’s most controversial laws prohibits foreigners from participating in labor unions. This means that living conditions for migrants often include 80-hour work weeks, intense manual labor, and below-minimum-wage salaries, FP reported. The typical situation for immigrants in UAE? “Tiny pre-fabricated huts, 12 men to a room, forced to wash themselves in filthy brown water and cook in kitchens next to overflowing toilets,” The Guardian reported

5. Australia

Australia may not come off as a harsh place for immigrants, but the country is still working off of its 1958 Migration Act, which mandates that non-citizens found to be in Australia without proper visas be detained. Furthermore, “unless they are granted permission to remain in Australia, they must be removed as soon as reasonably practicable,” according to the country’s Department of Immigration and Citizenship

A report by Australia’s Human Rights commission found that the country’s child refugees were abused and mistreated while in detention. 

49 notes
Permalink
Posted at 5:10 PM